Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social Archaeology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loren, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social skins

Orthodoxies and practices of dressing in the early colonial lower Mississippi Valley

Diana Dipaolo Loren

Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, dloren{at}fas.harvard.edu

While current anthropological interpretations employ notions of agency to interpret social practices in contact and early colonial period contexts, the interplay of doxa, orthodoxies and heterodoxies is often overlooked. When doxic (or unquestioned) beliefs were challenged during culture contact, attempts were made to reestablish colonial order through the creation of orthodoxies - laws and mandates - meant to police the daily routines of colonial subjects, many of which were viewed as heterodoxies (or inappropriate practices). Implicated in this discourse was the body and practices of dressing, which implied status, race and gender, as well as political, social and sexual interactions. In the case study presented here, I consider how both Native American and French subjects in the late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century lower Mississippi Valley created social identities at the intersection of doxic beliefs, orthodoxies regarding clothing and actions and the practices of dressing.

Key Words: colonial Louisiana • creolization • doxa • ethnohistory • Native American-European contact • social theories • the body

Journal of Social Archaeology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 172-189 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/146960530100100202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social ArchaeologyHome page
B. L. Voss
`Poor people in silk shirts': Dress and ethnogenesis in Spanish-colonial San Francisco
Journal of Social Archaeology, October 1, 2008; 8(3): 404 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social ArchaeologyHome page
M. S. Nassaney
Native American gender politics and material culture in seventeenth-century southeastern New England
Journal of Social Archaeology, October 1, 2004; 4(3): 334 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]