This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Arnold, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The limits of agency in the analysis of elite Iron Age Celtic burials

Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, barnold{at}uwm.edu

Burial ritual is an area of human behavior that at first seems particularly resistant to the identification of purposeful and intentional action in the archaeological past, at least when viewed from the perspective of the deceased individual. In the context of the European Iron Age this is partly because burial ritual falls so clearly into an area of group expression that is explicitly public and apparently conservative, but also because the actual focus of the activity generally is not in a position to influence the form of their own disposal. In fact, of course, it is possible to speak of agency in burial ritual from the perspective of both the deceased and the survivors involved in the mortuary performance itself. The question is to what extent and under what conditions individual action will be expressed in an archaeologically recognizable way.

Key Words: agency • burial • Celtic • doxa • individual • Iron Age • ritual

Journal of Social Archaeology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 210-224 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/146960530100100204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Haslam An archaeology of the instant?: Action and narrative in microscopic archaeological residue analyses Journal of Social Archaeology, October 1, 2006; 6(3): 402 - 424. [Abstract] [PDF]