Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social Archaeology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lele, V. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Material habits, identity, semeiotic

Veerendra P. Lele

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Denison University, Ohio, USA, lelev{at}denison.edu

Complementing recent archaeological work on identities, in this article I describe the semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce - his general ‘theory of signs’ - and discuss its uses for interpreting human identity through material culture and the artefactual record. Often classified as ‘symbolic anthropology/archaeology’, previous researches have presented a more restricted sense of semeiotic, while fewer scholars have been working through Peirce’s theories directly. Here, I articulate some aspects of Peirce’s semeiotic realism and his pragmatism with his theories regarding semeiosic matter and semeiosic identity. Specifically, Peirce regarded matter as ‘mind hidebound with habits’, and his semeiotic is particularly well-suited for analyzing the obdurate or habitual character of material culture. Based primarily on my ethnographic and archaeological fieldwork in an Irish-speaking region in western Ireland, I explore and apply some of Peirce’s theories to an interpretation of human social identities manifest through such things as prayer beads and field-walls.

Key Words: identity • Ireland • material culture • C.S. Peirce • semeiotic

Journal of Social Archaeology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 48-70 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1469605306060561
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?