Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social Archaeology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ammann, F. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Golden alienation

The uneasy fortune of the Gold Museum in Bogotá

Felipe Gaitán Ammann

Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, USA, fg2112{at}columbia.edu

Is Prehispanic gold a commodity or a gift? In the process of becoming a first-tier icon of Colombian identity, the Gold Museum in Bogotá has attempted to formulate an answer to this thorny question. Far from encouraging the valuation of gold artifacts as ancient commodities related to mundane aspects of social life, the Museum has focused its curatorial mission on enhancing the symbolic and spiritual meaning of its archaeological collections. In this article, I trace back the historical reasons leading the Museum to take such a path at the risk of favoring an essentialized understanding of Prehispanic goldwork in the present. Although maintaining this choice in a multicultural nation such as the one the Republic of Colombia officially claims to be today is a problematic decision, the Museum can build upon a refined understanding of the materiality of gold to overcome this impasse and bridge past and present in a socially productive way.

Key Words: Colombia • indigenous people • materiality • museums • Prehispanic goldwork

Journal of Social Archaeology, Vol. 6, No. 2, 227-254 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1469605306064242


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?