Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social Archaeology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Politis, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On archaeological praxis, gender bias and indigenous peoples in South America

Gustavo Politis

CONICET/Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina, gpolitis{at}museo.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar

This article discusses several aspects of the practice of archaeology in South America, specifically in the Southern Cone. Examining two key issues: the socio-political context of knowledge production and the positioning of South American archaeology in relation to its European and North American counterparts. Three cases that bridge these issues are examined. First, Gero’s argument for gender bias in the recording of field data, based in her ethnographic work during the excavation of the Paleondian site of Arroyo Seco 2. Second, the reburial of the human remains of Inakayal (an Indian chief who died at the end of the nineteenth century). Third, the excavation of the Inca mummies of the Llullaillaco peak in the southern Andes. The first is a critique on methodological grounds, the second demonstrates that Argentinean archaeology cannot free itself from its colonial past and the third illustrates the ethical dimension of archaeological praxis, specifically the complex interaction between local and foreign archaeologists.

Key Words: archaeological socio-politics • gender archaeology • reburial issues • South America

Journal of Social Archaeology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 90-107 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/146960530100100107


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social ArchaeologyHome page
J. R. Pagan-Jimenez
Is all Archaeology at Present a Postcolonial One?: Constructive Answers from an Eccentric Point of View
Journal of Social Archaeology, June 1, 2004; 4(2): 200 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social ArchaeologyHome page
R. Bradley
Seeing Things: Perception, Experience and the Constraints of Excavation
Journal of Social Archaeology, June 1, 2003; 3(2): 151 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social ArchaeologyHome page
P. P. A. Funari and A. Zarankin
Social archaeology of housing from a Latin American perspective: A case study
Journal of Social Archaeology, February 1, 2003; 3(1): 23 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]